sgusers2的部落格

LAWYERS for a Chinese general's son accused of taking part in a gang rape are waging a rare, Western-style war of words against his critics.迷你倉The airing of accusations surrounding the high-profile criminal case via the Internet has been all the more unusual because the teenage defendant is a member of one of China's wealthy and privileged families, who usually prefer to bury scandals.Li Tianyi, 17, son of Li Shuangjiang, 72, a popular military singer, has become the latest target of anger over abuses of power by the country's elite.Since news of his detention in the alleged gang rape of a woman at a Beijing hotel emerged in February, pictures of him and his family have been splashed across Chinese media and websites. The case surfaced after the victim told police that men she had been drinking with at a bar took her to a hotel and took turns raping her.This week, just days after Li and four others had been charged, Li's attorney Chen Shu told the Legal Daily newspaper that his client would plead not guilty, a report that incited a storm of renewed criticism.Li's lawyers also circulated a statement pointing the finger at an unnamed Beijing bar for allowing underage teenagers to consume alcohol."This case happened after a minor and others who were in a bar late at night were persuaded by adult bartenders to drink large quantities of alcohol, and then checked into a hotel," the statemen文件倉 said.This prompted the victim's lawyer to issue a statement saying Li's lawyers' comments caused her great "grief and indignation" on top of all she had been through and that she had also endured threats after the incident. The victim's identity has not been reported."The victim was wantonly beaten, insulted, and offended by Li and the others when she was isolated and helpless," lawyer Tian Canjun said, accusing Li of threatening the victim to stop her from reporting the case. "The victim lived in great fear and helplessness for two days and nights, afraid to tell anyone."Many news commentators also criticized Li's lawyers' statement."Not a single word in the statement mentioned the failure of the boy's guardians, instead it's the entertainment venue's fault, or the hotel's, and the adult men and women who accompanied him in drinking or persuaded him to drink," a China Youth Daily commentary said.Li's lawyers also sought to appeal to patriotism, saying the media were duty-bound to "protect and cherish the veteran artists who have spent most of their lives bringing songs and laughter to the people" - a tacit reference to Li's father, who is famed for his patriotic odes.Li was sentenced to a year in detention in 2011 as a 15-year-old for attacking a couple over a traffic dispute and threatening onlookers.Li was ridiculed in the media and his father was forced to make a public apology.存倉

　　■漫畫：王雲濤　　■廣州市委內的“曝光欄”。新華社發　　據新華社電 廣州市紀委近日在市委禮堂大廳以活動公告板的形式，迷你倉價錢公開曝光了通過網絡監控抓取的市屬機關工作人員上班時間在辦公室登錄與工作無關的網站，看視頻、玩遊戲、看股市等“庸懶散奢”行為，最嚴重的一個IP地址，平均每個工作日在線玩四個半小時。廣州市此舉在機關內部和社會上激起反響。　　然而，記者對被曝光的１１個機關單位逐個採訪核實，其中７個回應“不務正業”者是司機。究竟是廣州閑養了太多的公車和司機，還是司機成了另類“臨時工”，為公務員頂包？靠“科技＋曝光”，能不能治出公務員的勤廉作風？　　究竟誰在“庸懶散奢”？　　今年５月，廣州市紀委常委、新聞發言人梅河清在新聞發佈會上介紹，為落實中央八項規定，加強對全市整治“庸懶散奢”的監督，市紀委將會同市直機關工委，在市委、市政府大院設立機關作風“曝光台”和“回訪台”，每季度曝光一批機關工作作風問題及整改情況。　　７月初，新快報記者到廣州市委禮堂採訪會議，意外在禮堂大廳看到寫著“２０１３年廣州市整治‘庸懶散奢’機關作風‘曝光台’（第一期）”的展板。現場占了兩大板塊的“公務員上班時間在辦公室觀看與工作無關的視頻、玩遊戲、看股票行情等‘庸懶散奢’案例”最為搶眼。　　展板顯示，監控時段是２０１３年６月３日至７日這一個星期，每天９：００到１１：３０、１４：３０到１７：００兩段工作時間。監控結果顯示：廣州市科技和信息化局的一台電腦玩“ＱＱ超市”長達２２．３５小時，平均每天４．５小時；廣州市金融辦、城管委、科技和信息化局、人力資源和社會保障局各有多台電腦觀看網絡視頻１０小時以上；人力資源和社會保障局、財政局、國資委、發改委看股票行情各６至９小時。　　展板詳細列出了所登錄網站的名稱：ＱＱ寵大樂鬥、優酷視頻、東方財富通……　　一些廣州市機關單位的公務員告訴新華社記者，早些時候，市紀委要求各單位上報每台電腦的IP地址。沒想到，幾個簡單的數字報上去，紀檢部門就對每台電腦的動向瞭如指掌，並且動了真格監控、曝光。　　曝光引發了網友圍觀和熱議，許多人在為監督叫好之餘，也提出了疑問：這些機關單位究竟什麼人如此清閑？　　為獲取真相，記者對１１家被曝光的單位逐個採訪，得到了以下回應：　　●廣州市金融辦、廣州市科技和信息化局、廣州市發改委、廣州市民族宗教局這４家回應說：單位司機；　　●廣州市財政局回應：一名司機、３名科級幹部；　　●廣州市安監局回應：一個是專職司機，一個是負責網絡輿情監控的借調人員；　　●廣州市人力資源和社會保障局回應：２名司機、１名機關幹部；　　●廣州市經貿委回應：個別幹部；　　●廣州市國資委表示，安裝股票軟件的１５台電腦都是業務處室的，主要是為了監控上市公司股權或股票交易；　　●廣州市城管委、廣州市物價局沒有正面回應。　　監管　　只靠技術規章震懾　　不如激發內生動力　　廣州市安全監管局副局長方少華表示將安裝上網行為管理軟件，構築“庸懶散奢”行為“防火牆”。廣州市人力資源和社會保障局黨辦負責人也表示，將利用信息技術手段對看視頻、玩遊戲、股票買賣等網站或軟件進行痕跡記錄及技術阻斷。　　不少幹部群�認為，技術手段雖然對公務員有震懾作用，但機關單位不可能事無巨細地對公務員的所有行為建章立制迷你倉庫要改變思想作風、工作作風和生活作風，必須深挖思想根源，關鍵仍在於觀念的徹底轉變。　　一名長期在機關任職的老幹部告訴記者，公務員責任心不強的現象的確存在。一些機關幹部習慣于把自己的工作定位在“上傳下達”，上面來了任務，市機關把文件往下向區機關一轉，區又往街道一轉。就這樣層層向下轉文件、壓指標，然後自己靜等著評比、檢查、驗收。　　廣州市民郝先生說：“公務員是國家的精英，怎樣要像幼兒園小朋友那樣，一天到晚叫老師看著管著、事無巨細耳提面命呢？再完美的規章制度也不可能涵蓋所有禁止的行為，公務員首先要自律，心中應該遵守本分，知道什麼是該做的，什麼是不該做的。監管的重點，要放在辦事效率和辦事結果上。”　　公務員吳先生認為，目前，公務員的管理制度也存在一些不完善之處，“幹多幹少一個樣”，缺乏激勵機制和退出機制，讓公務員容易產生懈怠心理，還是要激發隊伍的內生動力，把為百姓服務變成“我願意做”。　　廣州市紀委表示，根據部署，整治“庸懶散奢”第一季的情況將在７月２０日進一步披露。　　閑養著多少公車和司機？　　從治理“公車私用”到整治“庸懶散奢”作風，“科技＋曝光”已經逐漸成為廣州市紀委監察不正之風的“殺手�”。　　但是，一場轟轟烈烈的“科技整風”，揪出來的大半是“司機”。面對這個採訪結果，記者先是出乎意外，再深入採訪，又覺情理之中。　　為什麼“閑”出來那麼多司機？平均每天在辦公室玩四五個小時電腦？一些基層紀檢幹部道破了真相：公車按機關幹部人數配備的。有些單位外勤少，常常一整天都沒有出車任務。廣州去年以來加大力度整治公車私用，實施“科技車改”，給每一台公車安裝了衛星定位系統，全天監控行車軌跡。推行一年多，今年６月，全市公車行駛里程比實施前減少了４５％。行駛里程減了一半，公車、司機一個沒動，能不閑嗎？現在公車治理，都在“禁止私用”上打轉轉，並沒有認真面對公車配備體制，沒有測算過一個單位真正需要多少公車。　　也有公務員告訴記者，處長以下的公務員外出辦事都是自己開車，機關單位的司機一般只給領導開車，常常就是接送領導上下班，然後全天就在單位待著。　　市民質疑又是“臨時工”？　　廣州市紀委“動真格”地整治機關單位“庸懶散奢”作風問題，對不正之風無疑起到了震懾作用。但是，當記者把這個對被曝光單位的採訪結果端到一些廣州市民面前，他們第一反應是質疑：司機成了另類“臨時工”，充當了頂包道具吧？　　特別微妙的是，記者在採訪過程中遇到一些單位擠牙膏式的“演變”：先是一口咬定說是“工勤人員”，再三追問“哪類型工勤人員”，於是擠出了“司機”；再三追問“全部是司機嗎”，於是又擠出“也有一些幹部”。　　面對紀委的曝光台，公務員們也百味雜陳。“這事一出，在公務員當中就炸鍋了，其實被曝的只是個別現象，不代表所有的公務員都在不務正業。”８０後公務員小韓喊冤道：“真正的問題是崗位忙閑不均，業務部門的工作很辛苦，‘白加黑’、‘５＋２’是常事，但也的確有一些崗位的人整天無事可做。”　　也有機關一再向記者陳述：有時候是登錄網站之後外出了，所以就一直掛在線上，實際上沒玩那麼長時間。　　這些機關單位都表示已對當事人進行批評教育，要求其深刻反省，認真檢討，並對整個機關單位進行全面整改和整風教育。不少機關還開始研究制定整改措施。王雲濤儲存

證券時報記者 範衛鋒隨著阿里的再度出拳，迷你倉阿里小貸和東證資管、諾亞財富等的合作浮出水面，原來略顯玄虛卻備受矚目的互聯網金融雛形，逐步清晰起來了。目前很多人談及互聯網金融時，尺度寬得有點過分，金融機構上網做一點業務也算，網絡公司和金融、證券沾點邊也算，這對各種概念股炒作固然是好事，但“正名”也是有必要的。否則，眼下支付寶、銀商寶、活期寶、餘額寶、現金寶之類太多，堪稱“萬寶路”，煙霧濃厚、看不清楚。我所說的互聯網金融的上半身、下半身，是指兩截原本應該打通、目前暫時被割裂的環節。說句大白話，上半身是說這些錢從哪裡來、怎麼募集、怎麼賣產品、怎麼營銷，是不是充分“互聯網化”，而“下半身”是指它的錢投給了誰、怎麼投、怎麼賺錢，是不是足夠“互聯網化”。如果誰把這上下半身對接上，打開氣血開關，�動血液循環模式，所謂的互聯網金融就雛形初現了。最近阿里很忙，正好提供了案例。它的餘額寶是互聯網金融“上半身”。吸引支付寶用戶在餘額寶里買貨幣基金，支付方式、營銷渠道都非常互聯網化。上文件倉身豔驚四座，半個月多就募集了70來億，許多狂蜂浪蝶隨之起舞。但是，它的下半身、資金投向卻很傳統，投向貨幣市場基金，最終也就是債券、票據、存款之類。而阿里剛剛公佈的新動作，算是“下半身”的例子。阿里小貸公司的一個私募信貸資產證券化產品募集完成了，從它的上半身，即客戶資金來源的角度看，它的資金可能還是來自線下的客戶資源為主，其互聯網化的程度和餘額寶完全不在一個水平線上。可圈可點的倒是它的下半身，也就是資金的投向。阿里小貸的客戶，主要是在天貓、淘寶、阿里巴巴里做生意的商家。它的核心資源並不是和客戶的所謂關係，而是它掌握的互聯網數據。這些客戶在它的平台上交易，貨款在它的平台上交收，阿里對它們的信用心裡有數，下半身基礎堅實。不過，在阿里小貸與金融機構的合作中，金融機構的實際油水應該非常少，有牌照的機構太多、有數據的只有阿里一家，金融機構能跟著喝口骨頭湯、賺點吆喝就不錯了。等到哪天阿里把上下半身合體成功，屆時想再喝口湯可能就難了，互聯網金融對傳統金融機構的壓力，正在於此。存倉

南方日報訊 （記者/昌道勵）在校學生信息莫名增加、班級信息集體失蹤、個人信息被張冠李戴……承載深圳百余萬中小學生個人信息的學籍管理系統，新蒲崗迷你倉昨日被媒體曝光信息管理混亂、壟斷經營。對此，深圳市教育局昨日中午發佈微博稱，將及時督促涉事公司儘快解決問題。一個並不屬於任何班級的學生，無故出現在羅湖外國語學校初中部的學籍管理系統中。桂園中學不僅出現學生信息的錯位，更有一個班級信息集體在線失蹤。40多本發霉的問題畢業證中，男生變成女生，照片與姓名對不上號。負責深圳中小學學生學籍信息管理和畢業證書製作的，都是南方教育軟件基地有限公司深圳分公司。除了學籍信息管理混亂，學校自行採集的學生照片無法通過南軟深圳分公司的系統。此外，有學校按照深圳市教育局發放的《全國中小學學籍信息管理系統照片採集要求》拍照，卻連拍3次照片都無法通過，理由是學校沒有上傳照片的權限，必須通過南軟深圳分公司上傳。對此，深圳市教育局回應mini storage，由中小學校採集的學生照片，經各區教育部門審核合格後統一上傳，市屬學校的則由市教育局上傳。由於在深圳市政府採購中心網站的採購結果公告中，無法查詢到深圳學籍信息管理系統的相關招標信息，家長和學校均質疑南軟深圳分公司壟斷經營。深圳市教育局回應稱，2009年，深圳市電教館通過市政府採購中心公開招標完成系統軟件採購工作，該公司承擔其中信息採集子系統，至此深圳各區自行採購的軟件系統統一整合起來。據瞭解，1997年，深圳市採用南軟公司開發的中小學生學籍管理軟件（單機版），是由上級部門推薦的。此後的2003年到2005年，深圳市各區教育局也相繼向該公司採購軟件，並使用了升級後的中小學生學籍管理系統（網絡版），實現市、區教育部門和各小學學生學籍聯網管理。涉及到100多萬名學生的身份證號、家庭住址、監護人姓名電話及身份證號，擁有系統平台所有權和管理權的南軟深圳分公司如何保證信息安全，也是外界質疑的焦點。self storage

Source: The Oregonian, Portland, Ore.迷你倉July 12--Gateway was going to be something special.Two decades ago, when planners, elected officials and economic developers looked at this collection of working-class neighborhoods and worn-down commercial strips, they predicted big, bold things.Gateway would be a "regional center," a bustling hub of high-tech jobs and educational institutions on Portland's eastern edge. Gateway would be a "second downtown," with all the parks, bike lanes, coffee shops and density to go with it.Instead, Gateway is underdeveloped, underutilized and under-served. Rather than the best of urban life in a more suburban setting, residents and business owners have usually received the worst of both.Taxpayers have spent millions to remake this literal doorway to east Portland. Yet Gateway remains a place where public services cost more, cars trump mass transit, property values lag -- and residents expect people in power to let them down.Built by Fred MeyerA half century ago, Gateway wasn't even a place. That was its appeal.Grocery store owner Fred Meyer, looking to expand, was tired of Portland regulations. He picked a spot amid the orchards of unincorporated midcounty, the no man's land between Portland and Gresham, and in 1954 built one of the region's first car-centric, suburban-style shopping centers.He named the place Gateway, and erected a tall concrete arch signifying the entry to a new kind of community."People looked to Gateway as the answer to urban decay: You don't want to live in the city but you don't want to be that far out," said Fred Sanchez, a real-estate broker and a leading booster of Gateway since the late 1960s. "This was the new frontier: 'Go east, young man!'"Orchards gave way to subdivisions. A 1953 Oregonian advertisement for homes in Lorene Park boasted of "modern ranch homes" built with sidewalks, "ornamental streetlights" and paved streets."Yes, for living at its best, for real luxury living, Lorene Park is your answer," the ad said.The boom didn't last long. Portland successfully revitalized closer-in streetcar neighborhoods, slowing outward migration. Those who did ditch the city for suburbia instead chose newer subdivisions in Clark, Clackamas and Washington counties, lands of lower taxes and more services.Portland annexed most of the neighborhoods around Gateway in the 1980s, to the chagrin of many residents who chose their homes specifically because they weren't inside city limits. Parallel to annexation, Portland built the Mid County Sewer Project. The city charged property owners to upgrade from septic tanks and cesspools to new sewer lines."They promised us all these services, then the first thing they did was send us a bill," said Linda Robinson, who grew up in Gresham and bought a home in Gateway in 1986. "That sort of set a mood."In 1992 mayoral candidate Vera Katz and her young campaign manager, Sam Adams, seized on east Portland's anger. Her opponent, then-City Commissioner Earl Blumenauer, ran the city sewer department. So Katz kicked off her campaign at an east Portland diner and made improvements in the neighborhoods beyond 82nd Avenue a key election promise:"People in that community feel that the door has shut on them," she said at one business association meeting. "They're absolutely right."Among political types, the sense was that a critical mass of voters was coming to the city's newest neighborhoods, particularly to those adjacent to Gateway. Metro planners looked at 2040 growth projections and declared the area one of eight "regional centers."City leaders, including future Mayor Charlie Hales, pushed for its inclusion: "We want it to be urban, but quieter and greener than downtown Portland," said Hales, who ran the city's planning department at the time.In reports and studies, planners promised huge changes, including construction of a network of connector streets, an education center, a government center, parks galore, wider sidewalks, a performing arts space and bike lanes. The district's main drag, 102nd Avenue, would become a "boulevard with landscaped walkways, storefront windows, benches and fountains." Residents would eat outside at cafes and coffee shops and gather at a new "Gateway Station Plaza."A 2000 study summed up the promise of Gateway: "More than anything else, it is expected to become a place to be proud of -- an embodiment of the values and aspirations of the east Portland community."Loading Photo GalleryBig plans never became realityFew of those envisioned improvements happened.Gateway remains decidedly suburban, with wide streets carrying traffic at speeds that preclude walking and biking. 102nd Avenue has new trees and banners yet remains a fast-moving four-lane mishmash of aging strip malls, car lots and fast-food outlets, with the occasional 1950s house nodding to the district's curious and inconsistent zoning history.There is no public square or plaza. The city owns land for a park at Northeast Halsey and 106th Avenue but lacks the money to build or operate it, and neighbors say drug dealers and homeless people plague the property.Though his concrete arch was razed in 1991, Fred Meyer would have no trouble recognizing the place."There's been a lot of talk, but very little has actually happened," said Jerry Koike, a longtime neighborhood activist. "Everybody talks about wanting to do things out here, but the execution is always about helping downtown."The recessions of 2001 and 2008 slowed development. Residents also blame government for years of benign neglect and poor prioritizing.City leaders created a Gateway urban-renewal district in 2001, meaning that the city can borrow money to make public improvements, then use the ensuing property tax rise to repay debt. Elsewhere in Portland, urban renewal has paid for game-changing projects, transforming South Waterfront, the Pearl District and the Northeast Portland commercial strips of Alberta Street and Mississippi Avenue, for example.Gateway's list of completed projects is very different and less impressive.Planners who took part in the creation of the Gateway district recommended that the first projects built with urban renewal money generate new tax revenue. Instead, the district began with a compromise. In exchange for City Council support to create the area, members of a citizens advisory committee agreed to spend their initial $682,000 on the "children's receiving center," a temporary home at 102nd and Burnside for children declared wards of the court."We were told that we needed to do this or we would face a much harder time getting the district approved. We were told, 'You guys aren't against children, are you?'" said Arlene Kimura, president of the Hazelwood Neighborhood Association. "In hindsight, it set a bad precedent."Gateway's urban renewal money contributed $3 mill文件倉on toward extending light rail to Clackamas County, built a $9 million parking garage at the transit center and covered half the cost of buying the future park site at 106th and Halsey.The district's latest high-dollar urban renewal project is another that doesn't put new property tax dollars back into Gateway: The Glisan Commons affordable housing development will feature 127 apartments on top of a new home for Ride Connection, a nonprofit that helps senior citizens and people with disabilities find transit options.Even the district's one clear economic success raises eyebrows.The three-story, $3 million Oregon Clinic complex, paid for with New Market tax credits earned with city help, is the first thing riders see when they arrive at the transit center. It brought more than 300 new jobs to Gateway and was the first Class A office building erected in the district in 20 years. Yet it's also a nondescript box with none of the street-level charm or retail needed to key transit-friendly development -- or called for repeatedly in all those plans for turning Gateway into a second downtown."I don't think anyone in charge was thinking long-term about why urban renewal was created here," said Colleen Gifford, who runs the Growing Gateway EcoDistrict, a nonprofit that promotes environmentally friendly development. "They've consistently taken money to do what people downtown wanted."Hamstrung by infrastructure and financial realitiesCity leaders say it's unfair to compare urban renewal in east Portland with more central locations."I don't think what's happened in Gateway is in any way a result of the projects we've chosen to invest in," said Patrick Quinton, the Portland Development Commission's executive director. "By no means do I consider Gateway a success, but I think the broader market has a bigger impact than we do."The view from east Portland"We get ripped off by paying a disproportionate share of taxes for services that we don't even get."-- Carrie A., Montavilla"The best thing about east Portland is the diversity. There is so much variety in lifestyle and experiences with diversity."--Lauren Ashley J., Powellhurst-GilbertSee moreGateway has a number of factors working against dramatic, quick change. It contains few large parcels of land owned by one or two developers, and thus has few properties ripe for projects that can change the course of a street or commercial strip seemingly overnight. Gateway is also a much smaller urban-renewal district -- 658 acres compared with 2,800 in Lents and 3,990 in Interstate -- meaning it has a much smaller tax base to generate redevelopment money.City planners and economic developers are hamstrung by the realities of underlying infrastructure established when Multnomah County, with its far more hands-off approach to development, ran the area. Gateway has those wide, pedestrian-deterring streets, few east-west connectors and a hodgepodge of large and small plots that make orderly, grid-style development difficult. Removing even one parking spot from Gateway Shopping Center, let alone the hundreds required to create a plaza or movie theater, would require every tenant's approval.Another, less tangible obstacle: City leaders and the people who live and work in Gateway haven't shared the same vision for what this neck of Portland should become.Early on in the process of creating the new urban-renewal district, neighbors balked at giving the city powers to condemn property in the name of blight removal. Early rezoning efforts allowed 14-story buildings in Gateway, until residents objected. Early plans for urban renewal would have spread tax-increment financing over twice as many acres, but the district shrank to avoid residential neighborhoods.Planners say their vision for Gateway may have been, in hindsight, unsophisticated and overly ambitious.Growth is still comingMetro still predicts enormous growth for Gateway over the next three decades. Computer models project the area from I-205 to the Gresham line will grow by up to 60 percent by 2035, with many of those newcomers landing here.For one thing, the district remains uniquely situated: It is the single most accessible spot in the entire area, within easy reach of two highways, a dozen bus lines and light rail in four directions. For another, neighborhoods closer to the central city can only take so many more residents. "Go east, young man" still applies.The question is whether that growth will improve quality of life and city budgets or add to east Portland's existing woes."Sixty-five million people go through Gateway by car or MAX each year. If we can get something that makes people stop and look at what we have, everything changes," said Ted Gilbert, a developer who owns the equivalent of eight city blocks near the transit center.He says that's Gateway Green, a grass-roots effort to turn 35 acres along I-205 into a public park for hiking and biking. Other advocates suggest building an international market, appropriate in a community with 70 languages spoken or an educational center to serve David Douglas and Parkrose school districts and local colleges.All the ideas center on the same theme: giving people a reason to stop in Gateway."We have no signature place," Kimura said.Small tweaks could help. The Transit Center is a small hub of activity surrounded by an ocean of concrete. There's a small concession stand, but no place away from the din of arriving buses and trains to talk with friends or enjoy the view of Rocky Butte over coffee.Consultants who looked at the station last year pointed out "a notable prevalence of negative signage such as no parking and no smoking ... which generally creates an atmosphere of mistrust and hostility." No signs direct new arrivals to any local landmarks. When the shopping center was rebuilt in the late 1980s, architects oriented the main entrances toward Northeast 102nd Avenue."If you get off the MAX, you're looking at the back of Fred Meyer, at loading docks," Gifford said. "It doesn't exactly say, 'Welcome to Gateway, a great place to do business.'"Broader fixes will be expensive.Gateway is not a blank slate like South Waterfront or the pre-revitalization Pearl District. Retrofitting smart growth and higher density costs more than creating it from scratch, even when neighbors approve.A 2012 market study by private consultants recommended taller, transit-friendly buildings to give the district a fresher, more urban feel and new crosswalks, street connectors and curb extensions to slow cars and encourage pedestrians. The estimated price: $110 million.Nobody has that kind of money for Gateway. At the moment, nobody is looking for it.Copyright: ___ (c)2013 The Oregonian (Portland, Ore.) Visit The Oregonian (Portland, Ore.) at www.oregonian.com Distributed by MCT Information Services存倉

　　據英國《每日郵報》7月11日報道，迷你倉汽車巨頭福特日前透露，目前正在開發一種“救護汽車”，能監控司機的健康狀況，甚至能在司機生病或者打瞌睡時代其駕駛。　　這種“救護汽車”里有一組醫用傳感器，能讓醫生遠程檢查司機的健康狀況。其早期版本已經在印度做過測試，福特公司現在想把它應用到消費者的車上。福特首席技術總監維賈伊·桑卡蘭說：“健康應用是汽車行業千載難逢的機遇。在印度，我們已經做過一些測試，即讓醫生使用機載電子設備進行基本的診斷，並將診斷結果傳送回中央位置。這種車已經成為某種意義上的移動救護車。”　　福特目前正在文件倉發內置這種傳感器的智能座椅、方向盤和座椅安全帶。福特發言人介紹說：“方向盤上的紅外傳感器能檢測駕駛員手掌及面部的溫度變化。駕駛杆下面的傳感器可以測量車艙溫度，為比較司機體溫的變化提供基礎。安全帶里的傳感器則可以估測駕駛員的呼吸頻率。”　　桑卡蘭還預測說，自駕車，比如穀歌開發的那種，不可能在未來十年裡大量上市。“很多人都有自駕車的概念——我們數年來一直在開發自駕車，我們有自適應巡航控制和停車系統——這些功能將不斷引進……自駕車也正是消費者所需要的。然而，一輛真正意義上的自駕車可能還要過十年才能上市。” ·歐葉·歐葉存倉

諾基亞（Nokia）為提升在智能手機市場的競爭力，文件倉背水一戰，前日（周四）推出新旗艦手機Lumia1020，最大賣點是鏡頭像素達4,100萬，順應用戶愛到社交網站分享相片的潮流，但操作系統依舊是「Windows Phone8」（WP8）。擁有4.5吋屏幕的Lumia1020，鏡頭像素比iPhone的800萬與GalaxyS4的1,600萬高得多，加上有六塊蔡司鏡片令影像更細緻；手機能處理的聲壓水平亦比其他手機高出六倍，不論照相還是拍片品質都超越同儕。六塊蔡存倉鏡片手機還有針對「龍友」的貼心設計，可選擇同時拍下兩張不同解像度的照片，高解像度的用以加工與保存，低解像度的可更快上載社交網站。行政總裁埃洛普在簡介會上揚言，Lumia1020「讓人盡情照相拍片，分享生活」。不過，Lumia1020保留冷門操作系統WP8，可下載的應用程式僅是iOS及Android手機的1/5，競爭力被削弱。手機本月26日開始先在美國發售，連兩年合約的綑綁式售價為300美元（2,340港元），9月底前陸續登陸中國及歐洲市場。法新社/路透社 自存倉

香港文匯報訊（記者 潘恆 杭州報道）全國首個跨境貿易電子商務產業園近日在杭州開園，儲存杭州成為內地首個跨境貿易電子商務服務試點城市。產業園目前已進駐ebay、阿里巴巴等電子商務巨頭，未來「海淘」將成為大趨勢。　杭州跨境貿易電子商務產業園的優勢在於海關通關流程優化。在產業園內，海關對出口貨物實行「分批出運、定期申報」模式，允許電商企業將一定時間段內的多份訂單歸併為一份報關單集中申報，解決了以往跨境電子商務以個人物品方式申報出口時遇到的難以退稅和結匯問題，大新蒲崗迷你倉降低了企業的通關成本；此外，在園區，海關等相關部門都設立了專門的辦事機構提供「一站式」通關服務，電商企業不出園區就能完成報關、物流配送和寄遞作業，實現通關提效、物流提速。　「和海關、質檢等部門在一起辦公，大大提高了我們出關的效率，原來需要1天才能辦完的流程，現在2個小時就在園區內全部搞定。」杭州全麥電子商務有限公司物流部顧問宋成說。據悉，園區內進駐了郵政EMS、順豐、圓通等物流企業，還引進了ebay、阿里巴巴等多家年進出口額在1億元人民幣以上的領軍企業。mini storage

□據京華時報報道李雙江、夢鴿之子李天一輪姦案的兩位新代理律師日前發表聲明，迷你倉新蒲崗稱當今社會和輿論對其不公，在網上引起一片嘩然。昨天凌晨，李天一代理律師之一王冉所屬的律所官網遭黑客攻擊，黑客留言稱：“只為還當事人一個公道。 ”李天一輪姦案的代理律師薛振源日前因扛不住壓力辭職，其父母李雙江、夢鴿又為兒子委托了新律師。 7月10日，兩位新律師陳樞、王冉發表聲明，稱北京警方以真實姓名披露李某某涉嫌強姦案已經涉嫌侵權，而媒體通過公開披露姓名、圖片、視頻等對該未成年嫌疑人李天一構成侵權。聲明還指稱多名成年男女酒吧人員對被告人進行陪酒勸酒，酒吧也存在問題。受害人楊女士的代理律師田參軍于前天也發出聲明，對李天一一方的觀點一一回應，並透露案發後，楊女士多次受到李某某的恐嚇和威脅。律師還透露，受害人看到對方的表態後 “感到極其悲憤、痛不欲生”。兩方律師的聲明一經發出，網上立即掀起了輿論風暴，網友們紛紛指責陳樞、王冉律師，而對受害者楊女士及其代理人表示同情與支持。據瞭解，王冉此前為海澱檢察院書記員。自昨日凌晨起，網上便紛紛迷你倉出租聞王冉所在的北京冉民律師事務所網站遭黑客攻擊，稱該網站首頁上留著“只為還當事人一個公道。 BY娃娃洗澡”。昨日晨，記者登錄該網站，發現該網站內“律師團隊”欄下，律師們的頭像全部被改成了一戴帽子的卡通小男孩兒形象。昨日下午，北京冉民律師事務所一值班人員回應證實，該網站的確遭黑客攻擊，不過，他們不想追究這事兒是誰幹的，“也不想改正過來，就先這麼著吧。 ”律師說法再氣憤也不能黑網站“李天一代理律師王冉所在的律所網站被黑，無疑是因為李天一兩位律師的聲明。 ”昨晚，北京煒衡律師事務所資深律師、全國律師協會刑事業務委員會委員許蘭亭分析稱。但是，許蘭亭表示，無論如何也不應去黑網站，“這是違法行為，甚至可以構成犯罪。”網友做出黑律師網站的行為，各種各樣的考慮都有，但無論你怎麼生氣都不能去黑人家的網站。網友有情緒，可以通過網絡發帖、微博、評論等等表達意見，無論怎麼看，“手段是極端錯誤的”。許蘭亭表示，既然做律師，就無非有兩種選擇，一種是有罪辯護，一種是無罪辯護。無罪辯護對律師而言，也是無可厚非的，但應基於事實和證據。儲存倉

中國政府網昨日公布的《國務院關於加快棚戶區改造工作的意見》(下稱「意見」)提出，迷你倉沙田中國將在5年內改造各類棚戶區1000萬戶。 意見要求，2013年至2017年改造各類棚戶區1000萬戶，使居民住房條件明顯改善，基礎設施和公共服務設施建設水平不斷提高。 意見指出，棚戶區改造是重大的民生工程和發展工程。2008年至2012年，全國改造各類棚戶區1260萬戶。