sgusers2的部落格

Source: Globes, Tel Aviv, IsraelJuly 19--Adv.迷你倉庫 Orian Eshkoli-Yahalom, a partner in the firm of Adv. Yoram Muszkat, who represented "Globes" together with Adv. Muszkat in the petition that led to the exposure of the tax benefits received by the large public corporations in the period 2006-2011, believes that the ruling in this case could cause a change of thinking by the authorities, and lead to greater transparency at government agencies in response to requests for information from the public."Judge Dr. Michal Agmon-Gonen rightly said that it could be that the state has not yet understood the revolution that the Freedom of Information Law has brought about. Perhaps in the light of the ruling the desired process of internalization will begin."Eshkoli-Yahalom stresses that the information in question would not have been released to the public without a court order. "There were comments in the media yesterday that the information on the tax breaks was published as a result of public pressure. Th儲存s of course is a mistake. The information was published only because of the petition by "Globes" and its deputy editor Eli Tsipori, and without a decision mandating it, it would not have been provided."Evidence of that is the Tax Authority's fierce opposition in the course of the court hearing to handing over the information, as also the attempt to have the hearing moved to the Jerusalem District Court on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, an argument that has become obsolete."According to Eshkoli-Yahalom, the state ought to review its decision to file an appeal in the Supreme Court against the ruling that the tax breaks received by private companies should also be disclosed, even before the hearing, just as it could have made a decision about the public companies before the ruling was handed down.Copyright: ___ (c)2013 the Globes (Tel Aviv, Israel) Visit the Globes (Tel Aviv, Israel) at www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/nodeview.asp?fid=942 Distributed by MCT Information Services新蒲崗迷你倉